Activity
Stars and mentions · Last 30 days, Oct 6 – Nov 4
Top repositories
stanford-oval’s repositories ranked by new stars, as on trending.
Contributes to
Repositories outside stanford-oval’s account where stanford-oval opened or reviewed pull requests in the past 365 days.
Who noticed stanford-oval
Everyone who starred or forked stanford-oval’s repositories since the archive began in 2011.
Notable accounts
Ordered by the stars their own repositories have received.
Biggest fans
Accounts that starred the most of these repositories.
Breakout weeks
Each repository’s best week of new stars, with the release published around it.
Achievements
Awards earned by the repositories stanford-oval owns. Select an award to embed its badge.
- Gold
- 21st place finishes
- Silver
- 22nd place finishes
- Bronze
- 03rd place finishes
- Awarded repositories
- 1Owned by stanford-oval now
Repositories
Ordered by gold, then silver, then bronze.
- stormBest: 1st by stars, 1,019 stars220
A repository earns an award for finishing first, second or third in a completed trending day or week, ranked by new stars, new forks or pull request authors. Awards follow a repository through renames and transfers and count toward its current owner. Weeks run Monday to Sunday, UTC.
Mentions
Did the Model Use That? Counterfactual Training Boosts Self-Attribution in Language Models Zikai Zhou, Jiacheng Sang, Yilin Xu, Yufei Jin, Monica S. Lam arxiv.org [𝚌𝚜.𝙲𝙻 𝚌𝚜.𝙰𝙸] 💬Code: stanford-oval/CREDIT t.co
Did the Model Use That? Counterfactual Training Boosts Self-Attribution in Language Models A fundamental challenge for explainable and accountable language models is revealing how external information influences their answers. This paper examines whether models are self-attributive: that is, whether they indicate when -- and only when -- their responses to questions are influenced by information provided alongside the question. Furthermore, we explore how self-attribution can be improved through counterfactual training, which explicitly teaches models to distinguish between answers that do and do not depend on supplied information. We found that most of the eleven frontier models rarely attribute influential information in their answers, and the rest attribute non-influential information. Training acknowledgment into reasoning does not fix this: the acknowledgment does not reach the final answer. We introduce CREDIT, which directly supervises final-answer self-attribution with counterfactual labels, without the need for human annotation. CREDIT substantially improves attribution in four open models, including two distilled reasoning models, and outperforms reasoning-level fine-tuning and prompting baselines. Among answers that agree with a user's suggestion, CREDIT distinguishes those changed by the suggestion from those the model would have given anyway. Gains transfer partly to unseen information types and prompts containing sources that support conflicting answers. Comments: 29 pages, 5 figures, 20 tables. Code: stanford-oval/CREDIT
Paper: arxiv.org Project page, videos, results: sheldon.genie.stanford.edu Code, prompts, configs: stanford-oval/sheldon Joint work with my amazing co-authors @PriyankShethia (equal contribution) and @MonicaSLam , Stanford OVAL (@StanfordOVAL) .
Trials & patients → SMT programs, canonicalized to SNOMED CT, projected to SQL with 100% recall w.r.t. the SMT constraints. 📈 +32–72% relevant & eligible trials vs. TrialGPT 📈 1.8–3.2× recall on TREC 2022 ⚡ 146 ms/patient Code is open source 👇 stanford-oval/clinical-trial-matching
@MonicaSLam @YuchengJiang0 @stanfordnlp @StanfordOVAL Paper: arxiv.org Code: stanford-oval/DataSTORM