Activity
Stars and mentions · Last 30 days, Oct 6 – Nov 4
Top repositories
caura-ai’s repositories ranked by pull request authors, as on trending.
Contributes to
Repositories outside caura-ai’s account where caura-ai opened or reviewed pull requests in the past 365 days.
Who noticed caura-ai
Everyone who starred or forked caura-ai’s repositories since the archive began in 2011.
Notable accounts
Ordered by the stars their own repositories have received.
Biggest fans
Accounts that starred the most of these repositories.
Breakout weeks
Each repository’s best week of new stars, with the release published around it.
Achievements
Awards earned by the repositories caura-ai owns. Select an award to embed its badge.
No awards yet
Repositories earn awards by reaching the top three in a completed trending day or week.
A repository earns an award for finishing first, second or third in a completed trending day or week, ranked by new stars, new forks or pull request authors. Awards follow a repository through renames and transfers and count toward its current owner. Weeks run Monday to Sunday, UTC.
Mentions
Exploring AI memory? 👀 Came across Caura, an open-source project for shared, persistent memory across AI agent fleets. 🔗 caura-ai/caura Check it out and drop a ⭐ if you find it interesting! #AI #OpenSource
Omg guys if you have a github account, PLEASE PLEASE STAR THIS REPO caura-ai/caura
Agents-as-Peers: Bias-Controlled LLM Evaluation as Multi-Agent Peer Assessment Large language model (LLM) evaluation commonly relies on fixed human-authored benchmarks or centralized human/model judges. Fixed benchmarks can age and enter model training corpora, while centralized judges introduce their own scoring preferences. We cast LLM evaluation as a multi-agent peer-assessment problem and introduce Agents-as-Peers, a distributed evaluation protocol in which every agent generates tasks, answers the shared task set, and judges the answers of its peers, with no privileged evaluator. Self-ratings are excluded from the ranking, and judging is repeated under controlled identity and presentation regimes so that self bias, identity effects, presentation-position sensitivity, and judge severity are measured rather than left implicit. In an instantiation with 12 LLMs and 420 agent-generated questions, Agents-as-Peers aggregates 55,440 non-self peer judgments per regime. Most agents assign their own answers higher scores than those answers receive from peer judges; visible identity changes scores for some agents; the first fixed answer slot is associated with scores 0.39 points higher than the shuffled baseline; and judges differ markedly in severity. On labeled benchmarks, peer scores align strongly with accuracy on TruthfulQA (Pearson r=0.904) and GSM8K (r=0.873). On TruthfulQA, the peer-score correlation is substantially higher than the self-score correlation (r=0.538). A benchmark-overlap screen and item-level human audit further characterize the endogenous task set. These results support Agents-as-Peers as a cohort-relative measurement protocol whose ranking is reported together with the biases and rater effects that shape it. Code and dataset: caura-ai/caura-PeerRank Comments: Version 2.0 of PeerRank
Made my first open-source contributions after joining @CodessCafe 2 PRs merged: 1. caura#2013 2. Opencollab-mcp#121 1 PR in review: OpsiMate#1166 Thanks @joeyousss and @plastixcxx for the push. looking for more challenges! #BuildInPublic #CodessCafe