Activity
Stars and mentions · Last 30 days, Oct 8 – Nov 6
Top repositories
bus1’s repositories ranked by new stars, as on trending.
Contributes to
Repositories outside bus1’s account where bus1 opened or reviewed pull requests in the past 365 days.
Who noticed bus1
Everyone who starred or forked bus1’s repositories since the archive began in 2011.
Notable accounts
Ordered by the stars their own repositories have received.
Biggest fans
Accounts that starred the most of these repositories.
Breakout weeks
Each repository’s best week of new stars, with the release published around it.
Achievements
Awards earned by the repositories bus1 owns. Select an award to embed its badge.
No awards yet
Repositories earn awards by reaching the top three in a completed trending day or week.
A repository earns an award for finishing first, second or third in a completed trending day or week, ranked by new stars, new forks or pull request authors. Awards follow a repository through renames and transfers and count toward its current owner. Weeks run Monday to Sunday, UTC.
Mentions
This might be revisionist since I wasn't around for the fights, but I think the criticism is split on Dbus the implementation and Dbus as a concept. There were quite a few fights around the implementation of D-Bus itself, as dbus-daemon which provided it was slow and with design faults. A few ideas were thrown around, causing the most fights being moving dbus into the kernel, that is kdbus. [probably the most revisionist statement here] I believe the topic basically died with bus1/dbus-broker which is a high-performance drop-in replacement for dbus-daemon, do read its announcement post here. I think back in the day you'd shake your fist at the clouds and complain that things were fine with pure sockets before, but nowadays I don't think about the daemon anymore. At all. (hooray ^^) For the protocol, I hate citing Vaxry but he's the loudest opponent I can remember, he disliked the underdocumentation of the protocol and that it encoded the types in the wire protocol itself. I'm fine with linking someone else with other criticism.