Activity
Stars and mentions · Last 30 days, Oct 5 – Nov 3
Top repositories
bigscience-workshop’s repositories ranked by pull request authors, as on trending.
Contributes to
Repositories outside bigscience-workshop’s account where bigscience-workshop opened or reviewed pull requests in the past 365 days.
Who noticed bigscience-workshop
Everyone who starred or forked bigscience-workshop’s repositories since the archive began in 2011.
Notable accounts
Ordered by the stars their own repositories have received.
Biggest fans
Accounts that starred the most of these repositories.
Breakout weeks
Each repository’s best week of new stars, with the release published around it.
Achievements
Awards earned by the repositories bigscience-workshop owns. Select an award to embed its badge.
- Gold
- 11st place finishes
- Silver
- 02nd place finishes
- Bronze
- 03rd place finishes
- Awarded repositories
- 1Owned by bigscience-workshop now
Repositories
Ordered by gold, then silver, then bronze.
- petalsBest: 1st by stars, 721 stars100
Every award
Top-three finishes of these repositories in completed trending days and weeks, newest first.
A repository earns an award for finishing first, second or third in a completed trending day or week, ranked by new stars, new forks or pull request authors. Awards follow a repository through renames and transfers and count toward its current owner. Weeks run Monday to Sunday, UTC.
Mentions
@Rasmic Someone will solve this one day, P2P style. Something like this bigscience-workshop/petals
bigscience-workshop/petals was meant to be this i think
Agreed, these models are not at the cutting edge of what's possible by any means. Although, I do think they provide a foundation to build on. Personally, I'd really like to see more efforts like Petals training and running models in a distributed fashion. Labs working on open weight models do tend to publish a lot of their research, so even if they don't release the source, the papers they produce can be adopted by the fully open implementations.