Stars and mentions
Last 30 days, Oct 4 – Nov 2
Package downloads
Cumulative recorded downloads · since 2026-04-08
Across 1 known packages in repositories WongKinYiu owns. Cumulative totals include recorded downloads before the selected range. Missing observations leave gaps; totals may be incomplete. PyPI excludes known mirrors.
Top repositories
WongKinYiu’s repositories ranked by new stars, as on trending.
Contributes to
Repositories outside WongKinYiu’s account where WongKinYiu opened or reviewed pull requests in the past 365 days.
Who noticed WongKinYiu
Everyone who starred or forked WongKinYiu’s repositories since the archive began in 2011.
Notable accounts
Ordered by the stars their own repositories have received.
Biggest fans
Accounts that starred the most of these repositories.
Breakout weeks
Each repository’s best week of new stars, with the release published around it.
- Gold
- 31st place finishes
- Silver
- 22nd place finishes
- Bronze
- 03rd place finishes
- Awarded repositories
- 2Owned by WongKinYiu now
Repositories
Ordered by gold, then silver, then bronze.
Every award
Top-three finishes of these repositories in completed trending days and weeks, newest first.
A repository earns an award for finishing first, second or third in a completed trending day or week, ranked by new stars, new forks or pull request authors. Awards follow a repository through renames and transfers and count toward its current owner. Weeks run Monday to Sunday, UTC.
Mentions
CASE: Concept-Aware Segmentation from Positive and Negative Visual Exemplars Few-shot semantic segmentation typically identifies target objects based on positive support examples of a single semantic class. In practice, however, positive cues alone are often underspecified: for instance, "red cars" may be confused with cars of all colors, "vehicles" may include cars that should be excluded, and "material-defined objects" may span multiple categories. Fulfilling precise requests requires positive exemplars to provide inclusion evidence and negative exemplars to act as intent-defining constraints for exclusion and disambiguation. We formulate this setting as Specified Visual Prompt Segmentation (SVPS), where the target concept is specified by both positive and negative visual prompts. In this work, visual exemplars refer to support-image regions specified by bounding-box prompts. To study SVPS, we introduce CASE (Concept-Aware Segmentation from Positive and Negative Visual Exemplars), a benchmark built on COCO and PACO. CASE encompasses six category- and attribute-level task families: exclusion, isolation, union, attribute exclusion, attribute isolation, and attribute union. We evaluate SAM 3 under this setting and find that, despite its powerful positive-only few-shot segmentation capability, frozen SAM 3 does not consistently treat negative visual prompts as exclusion evidence. To address this, we present Concept Prompt Adaptation (CPA), a conservative LoRA-based adaptation baseline that improves positive-negative prompt interpretation on CASE while remaining competitive under positive-only few-shot segmentation. Code is available at WongKinYiu/FSS-CASE. Comments: Accepted to ACCV 2026