SysCV

Activity

Stars and mentions · Last 30 days, Oct 5 – Nov 3

GitHub stars0
Mentions1
01234Oct 5Oct 19Nov 3
UTC days · repositories SysCV owns0 repositories

Top repositories

SysCV’s repositories ranked by new stars, as on trending.

Loading

Contributes to

Repositories outside SysCV’s account where SysCV opened or reviewed pull requests in the past 365 days.

Who noticed SysCV

Everyone who starred or forked SysCV’s repositories since the archive began in 2011.

Notable accounts

Ordered by the stars their own repositories have received.

Biggest fans

Accounts that starred the most of these repositories.

Breakout weeks

Each repository’s best week of new stars, with the release published around it.

Mentions

1post
Nov 40 posts
  1. Reddit · · r/computervision · u/Naive-Explanation940 · SysCV/bdd100k-models

    [P] Re-introducing BDD100K Toolkit + Model Zoo BDD100K is still one of the most useful driving datasets, but both bdd-data.berkeley.edu and bdd100k.com have been unreachable for me. The official toolkit has not had a commit since March 2024 and the official model zoo not since November 2022, and their legacy dependencies are hard to install cleanly on current systems. So I rebuilt the parts that matter, one task at a time, on current libraries (PyTorch, Ultralytics, timm, Hydra): dronefreak/bdd100k-toolkit Demo from the BDD100K-Toolkit Model Zoo It gives you one pipeline for data preparation, training, evaluation and demos on images and videos: bdd100k-prepare --dataset bdd100k-weather --raw-dir /path/to/raw --output-dir /path/to/out bdd100k-train dataset=bdd100k-weather model.name=yolo11n-cls dataset.data_dir=/path/to/out bdd100k-evaluate --dataset bdd100k-weather --checkpoint <run>/weights/best.pt --data-dir /path/to/out What works today - Image classification (unofficial tasks): weather, time of day and scenario, derived from the attributes.weather, attributes.timeofday and attributes.scene fields of the official JSON labels. 55 models trained across two backends, Ultralytics and timm. - Object detection: the 10-class detection task with the 2018 labels. 9 YOLO models and RF-DETR Nano, all on Hugging Face. - Semantic segmentation: the 19-class task, which uses the Cityscapes class layout. Evaluation of public pretrained models works. My own segmentation trainer exists but I have not run it on real data yet, so there are no BDD-trained segmentation models in the zoo. Datasets For each task I made unofficial Hugging Face repackagings of the original data and annotations, to make them easier to use with modern tooling. I checked the BDD100K data license: it allows copying and redistribution for educational, research and not-for-profit purposes with the copyright notice carried forward, and I kept that notice in every mirror. The mirrors grant no commercial-use rights beyond the original license. |Task|Location| |:-|:-| |Weather classification|dronefreak/BDD100K-Weather-Classification| |Time of day (period) classification|dronefreak/BDD100K-Period-Classification| |Scenario classification|dronefreak/BDD100K-Scenario-Classification| |Object detection|dronefreak/BDD100K| |Semantic segmentation|dronefreak/BDD100K-Semantic-Segmentation| Results All scores are on the validation set of BDD100K. The detection models are collected in the BDD100K object detection model zoo on Hugging Face. - Classification: best macro F1 is 68.7% for weather, 83.2% for time of day and 62.5% for scenario, all from TinyViT-21M. The classes are heavily imbalanced, so I report macro F1 and not just accuracy. - Detection (960 px): YOLO26s reaches 33.9 mAP@0.5:0.95 (58.8 mAP@0.5) and RF-DETR Nano 31.6 (56.9). - Segmentation: this is a zero-shot cross-dataset transfer evaluation: the models were trained on Cityscapes and evaluated on BDD100K without any BDD100K training. BDD100K shares the Cityscapes 19 classes, so I scored 9 public Cityscapes-trained models (SegFormer B0 to B5 and Mask2Former Swin-T, S and L) on the 1,000 val images. The best is Mask2Former Swin-L at 57.7 mIoU, then SegFormer B5 at 54.1. How to read the numbers These are solid baselines but not leaderboard numbers. The classification tasks are not official BDD100K benchmarks, the detection metric is the Ultralytics COCO-style mAP and not BDD's official ignore-rule evaluation, and the segmentation models were never trained on BDD100K, so they are not comparable to BDD-trained models. Making the evaluation match the official semantics is on the roadmap. What is missing, and a request Instance and panoptic segmentation and multi-object tracking are planned but not started, because I could not find the original labels for them. If you have a copy of the instance, panoptic or tracking labels, or know where one still lives, I would really like to hear from you. Feedback on the evaluation choices is welcome too, and so are issues and PRs. This is my first attempt at rebuilding an ecosystem like this, and I would like to keep developing it. BDD100K is too useful to become harder to use just because the tooling around it has fallen behind.

    3 points · 5 comments

Achievements

Awards earned by the repositories SysCV owns. Select an award to embed its badge.

No awards yet

Repositories earn awards by reaching the top three in a completed trending day or week.

A repository earns an award for finishing first, second or third in a completed trending day or week, ranked by new stars, new forks or pull request authors. Awards follow a repository through renames and transfers and count toward its current owner. Weeks run Monday to Sunday, UTC.