NethermindEth

Stars and mentions

Last 30 days, Oct 4 – Nov 2

GitHub stars12
mentions23
02468Oct 4Oct 18Nov 2
UTC days · repositories NethermindEth owns2 repositories

Package downloads

Cumulative recorded downloads · since 2025-11-01

npm2K
05111K1.5K2KOct 4Oct 18Nov 2
Oct 30npm: 1/1 packages observed

Across 1 known packages in repositories NethermindEth owns. Cumulative totals include recorded downloads before the selected range. Missing observations leave gaps; totals may be incomplete.

Top repositories

NethermindEth’s repositories ranked by new stars, as on trending.

Loading

Contributes to

Repositories outside NethermindEth’s account where NethermindEth opened or reviewed pull requests in the past 365 days.

Who noticed NethermindEth

Everyone who starred or forked NethermindEth’s repositories since the archive began in 2011.

Notable accounts

Ordered by the stars their own repositories have received.

Biggest fans

Accounts that starred the most of these repositories.

Breakout weeks

Each repository’s best week of new stars, with the release published around it.

Mentions

25posts
Nov 32 posts
  1. Reddit · · r/csharp · u/ben_a_adams · NethermindEth/LeanCIL

    LeanCIL: formal proofs for your compiled C#, checked by Lean Microsoft's October Patch Tuesday fixed over 1,400 CVEs, more than in all of 2025, and much of that came from AI-driven bug finding. Attackers have the same tools, and more of our code is now written by models that produce convincing code with subtle bugs. “The tests pass” isn’t a strong enough guarantee any more for code that matters. A couple of months ago I proposed an official Lean semantics for C# on csharplang (#10314). One reply asked why not do it at IL level, so it covers F# and everything else that compiles to IL. That’s what I built. You point it at a Release build and a method: leancil extract bin/Release/net10.0/MyLib.dll "Arithmetic::Add(ulong,ulong)" artifacts/Add leancil verify artifacts/Add --proof proofs/Add.lean and it proves your theorem against the IL Roslyn actually emitted. Change the implementation and the same proof fails. Supported (.NET 10, x64 and ARM64, 64-bit little-endian): - Integer arithmetic, including checked, with overflow and divide-by-zero as exact faults - Structs with explicit and sequential layout, enums, ValueTuple - Span<T>, ReadOnlySpan<T>, slicing, MemoryMarshal.Cast/AsBytes, BinaryPrimitives - Arrays, stackalloc, unsafe pointers with checked provenance - Generic methods and structs (proved per concrete type argument), constrained interface calls on structs - Function pointers and tail calls - Collection-expression lookup tables (static ReadOnlySpan<T> Table => [...]) - Selected Vector128/256/512, SSE, AVX2, AVX-512 and AdvSimd intrinsics; IsSupported branches are resolved for the chosen hardware profile - throw new ArgumentException(...) and similar, proved as the exact exception Not supported: float/double, class instances, try/catch/finally, ordinary recursion, virtual dispatch on classes. Unsupported code is rejected with a diagnostic, never silently accepted. The best fit right now is allocation-free integer code where a bug is a security bug: parsers, hashing, big-integer arithmetic, SIMD kernels. NethermindEth/LeanCIL

    39 points · 3 comments
  2. Reddit · · r/moderndotnet · u/ben_a_adams · NethermindEth/LeanCIL

    LeanCIL: formal proofs for your compiled C# and F#, checked by Lean Microsoft's October Patch Tuesday fixed over 1,400 CVEs, more than in all of 2025, and much of that came from AI-driven bug finding. Attackers have the same tools, and more of our code is now written by models that produce convincing code with subtle bugs. “The tests pass” isn’t a strong enough guarantee any more for code that matters. A couple of months ago I proposed an official Lean semantics for C# on csharplang (#10314). One reply asked why not do it at IL level, so it covers F# and everything else that compiles to IL. That’s what I built. You point it at a Release build and a method: leancil extract bin/Release/net10.0/MyLib.dll "Arithmetic::Add(ulong,ulong)" artifacts/Add leancil verify artifacts/Add --proof proofs/Add.lean and it proves your theorem against the IL Roslyn actually emitted. Change the implementation and the same proof fails. Supported (.NET 10, x64 and ARM64, 64-bit little-endian): - Integer arithmetic, including checked, with overflow and divide-by-zero as exact faults - Structs with explicit and sequential layout, enums, ValueTuple - Span<T>, ReadOnlySpan<T>, slicing, MemoryMarshal.Cast/AsBytes, BinaryPrimitives - Arrays, stackalloc, unsafe pointers with checked provenance - Generic methods and structs (proved per concrete type argument), constrained interface calls on structs - Function pointers and tail calls - Collection-expression lookup tables (static ReadOnlySpan<T> Table => [...]) - Selected Vector128/256/512, SSE, AVX2, AVX-512 and AdvSimd intrinsics; IsSupported branches are resolved for the chosen hardware profile - throw new ArgumentException(...) and similar, proved as the exact exception Not supported: float/double, class instances, try/catch/finally, ordinary recursion, virtual dispatch on classes. Unsupported code is rejected with a diagnostic, never silently accepted. The best fit right now is allocation-free integer code where a bug is a security bug: parsers, hashing, big-integer arithmetic, SIMD kernels. NethermindEth/LeanCIL

    30 points · 6 comments
  3. AI now finds bugs that survived decades of human review, and writes code that looks right but isn’t. Tests can’t keep up. LeanCIL: formal verification for .NET Proofs about compiled C# and F# (any dotnet lang), for every input, checked by @leanprover NethermindEth/LeanCIL

    45 likes · 11 reposts · 1,765 views
  4. Show HN: LeanCIL – Prove properties of compiled .NET code in Lean 4

    1 point
  5. If you run Nethermind on Hoodi, upgrade to 2.2.1 before 26 Oct. On today’s All Core Devs call, client teams postponed the Glamsterdam fork on Hoodi to review a change to its specification. A new date will follow. Meanwhile, upgrade your Hoodi node now: github.com/NethermindEth/nethermind/releases/tag/… t.co

    10 likes · 4 reposts · 824 views
  6. We successfully tested @Nethermind's standalone Rollup0 prover with the @etheconomiczone composer, including L1 proof acceptance and restart/recovery. One step closer to a public EEZ testnet with multiple prover clients! WIP draft: nethermind#13867

    13 likes · 6 reposts · 325 views
  7. Dev log #25 Hardening p2p networking and shipping interactive CLI features in Rust Hi, glad you found your way here. I'm Yash, a developer who contributes to open source, mostly p2p networking and AI tooling. Each week I write up what I shipped, what broke, and what fixing it taught me. GitHub · X · LinkedIn · Portfolio --- TL;DR Sometimes the most satisfying weeks aren't about the volume of commits, but the weight of the problems you're solving. This week was a deep dive into the guts of p2p networking and CLI ergonomics, all in Rust. I managed to get 5 PRs merged across two key projects, totaling 2,203 additions. The highlight was definitely landing the new interactive mode in Trak and tightening up some potentially leaky connection logic in minip2p. What I Built Most of my energy this week was split between two very different but equally interesting Rust projects: minip2p and Trak. Hardening the p2p Layer: minip2p Working on minip2p always feels like a battle against the inherent chaos of the internet. When you're dealing with NAT traversal and relay servers, you can't assume anything works the way it says it does. I spent a good chunk of time in the NAT and relay-server logic. One of the more critical fixes was addressing how we handle NAT renewals. I realized we were being a bit too trusting of the relay's expiration timestamps. If you trust an external server to tell you exactly when your mapping expires, you're asking for a dropped connection. I pushed a fix to schedule renewals at half the lifetime, providing a much-needed safety margin. I also dug into the relay-server itself to ensure we’re properly counting finished HOP workers against the connection cap. In p2p, if you don't track your resource usage with surgical precision, you end up with "ghost" connections that eat up your capacity until the whole node crawls to a halt. On the swarm side, I tackled a gnarly edge case where abandoning a peer-closed stream wasn't properly acknowledging its dropped data. It’s one of those "invisible" bugs that doesn't crash the app but leads to weird state mismatches over time. Getting that fixed (and documented) makes the whole stream lifecycle feel much more robust. Better Exploration: Trak On the developer tooling front, I’ve been contributing to Trak. This week was all about making the tool more "explorable." The big win was landing the interactive mode. Previously, you had to know exactly what subcommand you wanted. Now, if you run trak with no arguments, it drops you into an interactive session. I also mirrored the --tree functionality from callers over to calls. When you're trying to map out a complex codebase, being able to see the call hierarchy as a tree is a game-changer. I ended up adding about 1,757 lines to Trak this week, which included a lot of work on the interactive match list ordering and driving a scripted interactive session against the binary to make sure the UI doesn't regress. Pull Requests It was a "clean sweep" week for PRs—5 opened, 5 merged. In minip2p, pull #323 and pull #322 were the heavy hitters for networking stability. The former dealt with that NAT renewal skepticism I mentioned, while the latter fixed the connection cap accounting in the relay server. I also landed pull #321, which ensures we're properly acking data when a stream is abandoned. These are the kinds of fixes that you don't "see" as a user, but you definitely feel when the network stays stable for days instead of hours. Over at Trak, pull #3 was the massive one. It introduced the interactive mode and changed the default behavior of the CLI. It’s always a bit nerve-wracking to change the entry point of a tool, but the feedback on the whole-branch review was solid, and I think it makes the tool much more approachable for new users. I also squeezed in pull #2 to add the --tree flag to the calls command, keeping the API surface consistent across the different search modes. Issues & Discussions While most things went smoothly, I did open one issue in minip2p that's going to need some brainpower next week. Issue #324 is about our manual-ack backpressure tests. Right now, the tests are a bit flaky because they interpret "the link has been quiet for 500ms" as "the link has stopped." In a real-world network (or even a busy CI runner), 500ms of silence doesn't necessarily mean the backpressure is working; it might just mean the CPU was busy elsewhere. I need to find a more deterministic way to validate that the data flow has actually paused without relying on wall-clock timers. Code Reviews I also spent some time in the dotnet-libp2p repo, helping out with some code reviews. Even though my own coding this week was 100% Rust, the p2p world is small, and the concepts carry over. I approved pull #303, which adds a fuzzing harness for core channels. Fuzzing is absolutely essential for networking code—if there's a weird state transition possible, a fuzzer will find it long before a human does. I also took a look at pull #299 regarding Yamux stream registration. Ensuring outbound frames don't get ahead of stream registration is a classic race condition in multiplexers, so it was good to see that getting tightened up. Tech Stack This was a pure Rust week. 8 commits, all in Rust. The line counts tell an interesting story: +2203 / -173. Usually, I like a higher deletion ratio (nothing feels better than deleting code), but this was a heavy feature-work week for Trak. Building out an interactive TUI (Text User Interface) and the associated logic naturally involves a lot of new code. I didn't hit a 7-day streak this week, but the work I did put in was high-intensity. Sometimes you need those gap days to let the p2p state machine logic settle in your head before you write the next line of code. What's Next Next week, I need to tackle that backpressure test flakiness in minip2p. Flaky tests are the bane of my existence, and I won't feel comfortable adding more features until the CI is rock solid. I'm also planning to keep refining the interactive mode in Trak—now that the foundation is there, I want to see if I can make the navigation even snappier. The p2p stack is feeling more stable, and the CLI tools are getting more powerful. It's a good place to be. See you in the next update!

    5 reactions
  8. Introducing Suno: DeFi yield backed by solar energy Hi r/RWA, I’m Nicolás, co-founder of Suno Finance. This is the founder’s view of our own protocol, so read it with that in mind. About Suno Suno (app.suno.finance) tokenizes cash flows from solar plants (curr. 25 solar farms, ~$5M AUM, some producing for six years). uWatt mints and redeems against USDC at min($1, NAV), with a 1.15x collateralization target (currently 1.12x). Deposit it in our ERC-4626 vault and you get c-uWatt, which compounds hourly at ~12% APY. It’s live on Ethereum with a LayerZero bridge to Polygon, and Base is coming soon. LP campaign There’s a c-uWatt/USDC Stableswap-NG pool on Curve mainnet (0x07830699FE73Eb90f1b3b466Ce88C38d4EEdd83B), with a gauge approved by Curve DAO. Staking LP tokens on StakeDAO earns boosted CRV at ~65% APR right now, settling near ~12% once TVL reaches $500k. You earn that on top of the solar yield and swap fees. Where the yield comes from New capital funds project finance loans to solar plants, underwritten on debt service coverage and repaid from energy revenue. A liquid sleeve of stablecoins and tokenized treasuries handles redemptions, with 10% of AUM reserved for them. The Colombian pipeline could absorb >$20M, and Ecuador and Brazil are next. Regulation and KYC Ensuro Re Ltd. issues uWatt in Bermuda under a BMA Class F license (DABA). It’s treated as a security and isn’t available to U.S. persons. You need KYC only to mint or redeem through the Suno Desk. Trading, LPing and staking are permissionless. Audit Nethermind reviewed the protocol in Sep 2026: github.com/NethermindEth/PublicAuditReports/blob/… Risks - Solar assets: yield depends on generation and offtakers paying. Collection is above 96%, though some older projects have had delays. The largest project is ~24% of the Reserve, and every asset is in Colombia, so local regulatory and FX risk apply. - Valuations: Suno pushes them on-chain using a public methodology. An Accountable proof-of-reserves dashboard is coming. - Liquidity: redemptions are instant while the liquid sleeve lasts. After that, exits depend on Curve liquidity or incoming cash flows. - Contracts: a 3-of-5 multisig holds the admin roles, and a timelock is on the roadmap. Curve, Stake DAO and LayerZero each add their own contract risk. About me I’ve spent 9+ years building and financing solar, and I co-founded Solenium in 2016 (a solar project construction company, >$40M annual revenue), Unergy (licensed utility company in Colombia) and Zentrack (hardware for solar farms). Questions and critical takes are welcome.

    1 point
  9. I built it instead 😁 Introducing LeanCIL - formal semantics for .NET CIL in Lean 4, with machine-checked proofs against actual compiled assemblies Not just C# - a foundation for verifying F# and other .NET languages too Let's formally verify dotnet NethermindEth/LeanCIL

    68 likes · 15 reposts · 2,328 views
  10. Gm everyone, here are the latest updates on cBNB: • Our website is live: cbnb.network • The @Nethermind audit is public on GitHub: github.com/NethermindEth/PublicAuditReports/blob/… • Thanks to @procur3, whose marketplace helped us find the right auditor • Our Featured App application for cBNB was submitted 6 days ago • 10+ partners are ready to integrate cBNB into their apps • 25M CC locked via @cashen_cc for cBNB, paving the way for us to become an asset issuer on Canton Keep building!

    13 likes · 5 reposts · 447 views
Trending awards, every completed day and week
Gold
01st place finishes
Silver
02nd place finishes
Bronze
03rd place finishes
Awarded repositories
0Owned by NethermindEth now

No trending awards yet

None of the repositories NethermindEth owns has finished in the top three of a completed trending day or week, by stars, forks or PR authors. See who is trending now.

A repository earns an award for finishing first, second or third in a completed trending day or week, ranked by new stars, new forks or pull request authors. Awards follow a repository through renames and transfers and count toward its current owner. Weeks run Monday to Sunday, UTC.