Activity, over time
Daily observations from the public event archive.
Attention
Daily stars & forks
Star accumulation
Cumulative stars
Pull requests
Daily opens & merges
Conversations
Daily issues & comments
Community
Daily accounts & reviews
Releases
Daily releases
Trending history
Daily top 10 · last 90 days · UTC
Mentions
Stars
Forks
Contributors
Latest stargazers
The last 10 distinct accounts we observed this year.
Most active participants
PR, issue, comment & review events in the past year.
Packages
Scan pending.
Live mentions badge
Show how many posts mention your project in the last 30 days.
Live mentions · last 30 days
Mentions
This is a great post, and you captured really well what makes Void so unique and lovely to engage with. Despite packaging being so high quality, it's great that there's still improvements to be had. I would be really interested to know more about: 1. What apk solved more specifically that xbps couldn't. You mentioned dependency resolution, is it just that it makes virtual dependencies a stronger default? 2. This is completely tangential, but choices to use dinit and musl. Admittedly the use of musl is why I've not given chimera more time: I'm paranoid that I'll need some Linux binary to function in society (e.g. zoom) and I'll hit a wall. Runit is really neat, but nitro really shows that there's capacity to improve significantly and I would love to know how dinit was chosen and your thinking there. 3. Did you think much about build flags, variants and even -git packages when designing your system? I do wish for a brave-bin out of curiosity, a neovim-git for practicality, etc. It's frustrating we don't have .NET packaged yet on Void, so no *arr stack. I'm wondering if Chimera is able to tackle these with its design! It's been really nice using turnstile as part of my setup and reinforcing that systemd-less can function really well!