Activity, over time
Daily observations from the public event archive.
Attention
Daily stars & forks
Star accumulation
Cumulative stars
Pull requests
Daily opens & merges
Conversations
Daily issues & comments
Community
Daily accounts & reviews
Releases
Daily releases
Trending history
Daily top 10 · last 90 days · UTC
Mentions
Stars
Forks
Contributors
Latest stargazers
The last 10 distinct accounts we observed this year.
Most active participants
PR, issue, comment & review events in the past year.
Packages
| Package | Version | Downloads · 30d | Trend · 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
compactv0.1.2 | v0.1.2 | ≥139 | |
| — | — | — | |
glossaryv0.4.13 | v0.4.13 | ≥90 | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
interceptionv0.6.0 | v0.6.0 | ≥685 | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
verifiersv0.4.1.dev99 | v0.4.1.dev99 | ≥1.7M | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | |
wordlev0.2.1 | v0.2.1 | ≥128 |
README badges
Embed a badge in your README or website.
Live mentions · last 30 days
Mentions
Some translation: “The two-sided Hoeffding bound tells you how many agents to run, but only if the errors are independent, which is why the verifier design PrimeIntellect-ai/verifiers matters perhaps more than the agent headcount. An external check (tests, benchmarks) doesn't rely on the agents' errors being independent, and decorrelated reviewers (different models and contexts) push ρ down.”
@gauravisnotme you should try to integrate verifiers into it for the environment PrimeIntellect-ai/verifiers
Read our blog post here: primeintellect.ai prime-rl 0.10.0: github.com/PrimeIntellect-ai/prime-rl/releases/ta… verifiers 0.4.0: github.com/PrimeIntellect-ai/verifiers/releases/t… Thank you to everyone who contributed, including 11 new prime-rl contributors