neptts-bench

Activity, over time

Daily GitHub activity and social mentions.

Mentions

Daily posts linking to this repository

Loading mentions chart

Attention

Daily stars & forks

Loading attention chart

Star accumulation

Cumulative stars

Loading star accumulation chart

Pull requests

Daily opens & merges

Loading pull requests chart

Conversations

Daily issues & comments

Loading conversations chart

Community

Daily accounts & reviews

Loading community chart

Mentions

1post · 30d
Nov 50 posts
  1. arXiv · · eess.AS · Ashish Thapa

    NepTTS-Bench: Native-Speaker Benchmarking and NepaliMOS for Nepali Text-to-Speech Nepali TTS has reached a point where multiple systems are available, but there is no shared evaluation to compare them. NepTTS-Bench was created to address what existing automated and manual evaluation systems lack for Nepali TTS. A controlled benchmark with phonological grounding which contains 205 sentences (77 minimal pairs targeting aspiration, retroflex/dental contrasts, nasalization, gemination, and schwa deletion) which is rated by 180 speakers. There are 6,962 ratings for 10 TTS configurations and two human references. Along with this 7 ASR systems were evaluated for round-trip CER. SCOREQ was also run as an automated baseline. The key finding is that automated evaluation like SCOREQ prefers proprietary systems like ElevenLabs but native listeners prefer Piper. This is contributed by the fact that most of the systems not properly tuned for Nepali tend to show Hindi phonological behaviour and our minimal pairs are designed to surface such contrasts. We also present NepaliMOS predictor which is fine tuned on collected ratings. NepaliMOS achieves system-level rho = 0.90 on the dense panel but drops to utterance-level rho = 0.43 under leave-one-system-out evaluation. This is statistically significant and confirms that NepaliMOS captures genuine signal but cross-provider transfer is limited. A human calibration is recommended for new systems for which we release a Python evaluation package for practitioners to run the benchmark against new systems. Comments: 5 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables. Dataset: huggingface.co ; code: Ampixa/neptts-bench

Latest stargazers

The last 10 distinct accounts we observed this year.

Most active participants

PR, issue, comment & review events in the past year.

Packages

Scan pending.

Live mentions badge

Show how many posts mention your project in the last 30 days.

Live mentions · last 30 days